Archive for February, 2017
Name: Nicole Spoor
Job Title: Business Librarian
Institution: University of North Carolina at Charlotte
NMRT Board Position/Title: Leadership Development Director
What role does your Board Position serve in NMRT? I oversee three awards committees, the NMRT Online Discussion Forum, and the Annual Social Committee.
How long have you been an NMRT member? I think for about 7 years.
What’s your favorite thing about NMRT? It is really the people. I have made so many connections through NMRT. NMRT is, in my opinion, the most inviting, inclusive group in ALA. I would also have to say that I have a special place in my heart for the NMRT Resume Review Service. I served on that committee for quite a few years and it was very rewarding. I have seen the great work done by the committee and the volunteers. It was always wonderful to hear that the service helped someone find a job.
What advice would you give to someone just joining NMRT this year? Show up and get involved. Don’t be shy about it. Everyone in NMRT is in the same boat or has been there at some point. It is one of the best ways make ALA work for you.
Meet Your NMRT Board Member is a 2016-2017 series to help NMRT members get to know their board. If you have any questions about this series, please contact the NMRT Communications Committee Chair, Melanie Kowalski (firstname.lastname@example.org).
When: Thursday, February 23, 2017
Time: 2:00pm to 3:00pm, US/Eastern
1:00pm to 2:00pm, US/Central
Professional development is a priority for most librarians. In today’s world of limited budgets, and sometimes even more limited time – how do you find professional development opportunities? What are the best sources in your area for these opportunities? Where else can you look? If you do need to ask for funding, how do you do that?
This chat will be happening on Twitter. To join and follow the chat, follow Carrie Fishner @CJFishner and/or follow the hashtag #nmrtchat You can follow the tweets by typing #nmrtchat into the search box or use something like TweetDeck or HootSuite to filter the tweets.
The most important thing is to include #nmrtchat in all of your tweets to make them visible for all participants.
When the chat starts, send a tweet to introduce yourself, it’s always helpful to know who everyone is.
Carrie, the chat moderator will be asking 4 questions in the Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 format, and followers will use the #nmrtchat and answer in the A1, A2, A3 and A4 format.
Feel free to retweet any comments you like or agree with, and share any articles or blogs of interest.
Look forward to seeing you all at #nmrtchat !
The focus of the January discussion was on mentorship opportunities, especially for professionals new to the field of librarianship. The discussion began by asking who had participated in a professional mentorship, where had they found the opportunity, and what had they gained or hoped to gain from the relationship. Input was also sought from those who had been able to act as mentors, instead of just as mentees. Finally, what makes a good mentorship relationship?
Based on the input in the discussion, mentorships seemed to fall into broad categories: formal mentorships, either short- or long-term, and informal mentorships. Formal mentorship opportunities were often found through professional organizations, like the ALA, its round tables or divisions, or state-level organizations. Joining a professional organization is a common first step for someone looking to build a professional network or seeking more experienced professional contacts. Participants in formal mentorship programs were matched with volunteer mentors, often in the same field or region of the country, but not necessarily so. Universities also often offer mentorship opportunities to recent graduates, pairing them with alums from previous classes.
Formal mentorships might be short or long term. Long-term mentorships can be set for a certain period of time, say a year, or might be open-ended, to be concluded by the participants themselves. Short term mentorships are frequently seen at conventions, where first-time attendees are paired with returning attendees. The first-timer is able to benefit from the other’s prior experience, and be less overwhelmed by the size of the convention.
More casual mentorship-style relationships can arise between acquaintances. Junior professionals might turn to more experienced librarians within their organization or institution. Someone looking to go into management might work with a manager at their own institution in order to learn skills to use themselves someday. These might never be formally labeled “mentorships” by the participants, but still provide the same benefits.
Overall, mentorships are considered very positive, helpful experiences, but also vary as widely as the people participating in them. Many participate in mentorships to build professional networks. Others seek a mentor in certain areas of librarianship or within their own organization or institution. Some seek mentors specifically outside of their own institution or field, in order to have a broader perspective on things like resumes, interviews, professional development, or institutional politics. The most successful mentorships appear to depend on the compatibility of those participating. Similar communication styles are helpful, for example, or similar ways to approaching a problem. Mentors and mentees both must be able to listen to the other well, and communicate clearly what they wish to share.
by Lara Harrison
Thanks to the work of the members of the Midwinter Social Committee, the NMRT Midwinter Social was a success! The Social took place on January 21 at the Marriott Marquis and attracted nearly 40 attendees eager to battle it out for the title of trivia champions. Teams were divided up based on their birth month, which gave everyone a chance to socialize and network over drinks and a vegetable bar. This year the committee introduced some opportunities for attendees to show off their creativity, which was put on full display when teams lined up to compete in a vicious paper airplane flying competition. While there were a few nosedives, it became clear a couple of attendees would have made great aerospace engineers.
If you’re headed to Midwinter in Denver next year, make sure to attend the Social. It’s always a blast!
Deadline: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 5 pm (EST)
We are excited to announce that members of ALA’s New Members Round Table (NMRT) can apply to receive a $1000 grant, which will assist with expenses to attend the ALA Annual Conference, June 22 – June 27, 2017 in Chicago, Illinois. This award is generously sponsored by Mango Languages.
You must be a current member of NMRT in order to apply. To join NMRT, visit the ALA website and follow the “Join ALA” link to add NMRT to your ALA membership, it is well worth the low cost! Successful applicants will show their attendance at ALA will impact their home institution, NMRT or another ALA organization, and their personal professional development.
Click Here to go to the application.
Questions? Please contact Katy Holder, Chair of the NMRT Professional Development Grant Committee, at email@example.com.
Endnotes Book Review Guidelines
The Endnotes Committee would like to thank you for your interest in serving as a book reviewer. As of January 2017, the Endnotes Committee has revised the submission criteria to be more inclusive and representative of the diversity and discipline specialization across our profession. We thank you for your time and interest, and kindly ask you to adhere to these guidelines.
Overview of Book Review Process
The Endnotes Committee will allow book reviewers to select a monograph of their choice, provided it meets Endnotes selection criteria, and the reviewer can justify the merits of the selected work. Reviewers must submit a book review pitch that is to be no longer than 150 words and make a concise, cogent case for their proposed review. All book review pitches should be sent to the Endnote Editors at firstname.lastname@example.org. After evaluation by the Endnotes Committee, the selected reviewer will be green-lighted to write a 500-650 word book review written in the APA format by the submission deadline. After a final check by the Endnotes Committee, the reviewer will make revisions and submit the Endnotes “author agreement” form before the reviewer will be accepted for publication.
The Book Review Criteria
The pitch can take a multitude of forms:
- How will the work influence scholarship in the field, or on the topic?
- Has the topic, or idea been neglected by scholarship?
- Does the work make contributions to the practice of librarianship?
- How has the work impacted the book reviewer’s teaching and practice of librarianship?
There is leeway for the reviewer on how they wish to justify the inclusion of their book review for the current publication of Endnotes. Questions and further clarification can be directed toward the Endnote Editors if needed.
Reviewers will be allowed to select monographs that pertain to the issues, pedagogies, and technical works that currently affect librarianship. The Endnotes Committee is looking for book reviews that address a broad range of issues in librarianship. However, publications should be written at a professional, authoritative level and contribute to the professional discourse of a particular field specialization, or librarianship as a whole.
Endnotes asks that the publication of the selected monograph be current: within two years of Endnotes publication date. Reviewers need to furnish their copy (it does not need to be purchased; please feel free to utilize your library and/or interlibrary loan), as Endnotes cannot and will not provide a copy of the selected work. The written book review should not be under consideration for publication or previously published.
- The book reviewer selects a professional work that contributes to the professional discourse of ideas, or relates to issues, teachings, and technical issues that currently affect librarianship. Publication should be within the last two years.
- The reviewer must submit 150-word book pitch to Endnote Editors at email@example.com.
- After the pitch is accepted, the reviewer must write a book review of 500-650 words. All book reviews should be in APA format (6th ed).
- Book reviews should not be under consideration for publication or previously published.
- Completed book reviews should be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org to be considered by the Endnotes Committee.
Josh Rimmer & Tammy Ivins, Chairs, 2016-2017 NMRT Endnotes Committee